info Annual subscription to The Spectator online for only £57.50.
Full refund within 30 days if you're not completely satisfied.
page:
contents page
previous next
zoom out zoom in
thumbnails double page single page large double page
clip to blog
page
page:
contents page
previous next
zoom out zoom in
thumbnails double page single page large double page
clip to blog

— ‘The Pin’, ‘Tugger’, ‘The Brain’. Clubfooted drug-dealer The Pin (a brilliant Lukas Haas) dresses in black and walks with a cane, while his muscle wears white. Telephone calls are made and received in phone booths under street lamps. Folded pieces of paper, bearing mysterious pencilled messages, slip out of notebooks. Brendan throws a number of punches, and is punched in return — like Bogart he barely flinches. And the characters speak the language of the detective novel (cinema tickets will come with a glossary, apparently). I do like the fact that, at a moment when film-makers seem generally to be aiming for documentary-style realism, Rian Johnson (who makes his writing/directing debut with Brick ) has made a film which is anything but. It is a bold move to be so proudly self-conscious, to reference openly the character types, dialogue, camerawork and story structure of a genre which had its peak 60-odd years ago. Since a high proportion of Johnson’s target audience will be teenagers who might never have seen a black-and-white film, quite what they’ll make of the rapid-fire dialogue and outdated lingo I can’t imagine. He must be hoping they’ll find it impossibly cool. And it is cool. Considering how much of its style is a copy — sorry, an homage — it does seem pretty original, or at the very least surprising. Its set pieces are beautifully executed: a chase on foot through the school grounds; a ‘duel’ in a carpark between Brendan and a black Mustang; and a tense stand-off between four key players at the mouth of a dark tunnel. It has startling, funny and brutal moments; sometimes it is all those things at once. It looks terrific and sounds even better. In pieces, it is a success. But not as a whole. The characters are a shallow bunch, and when they ‘speak detective’ it only makes them harder to identify with. They are all too busy playing hard-boiled to be engaging, and even Brendan hides his pain so well that, although we admire him, we cannot love him. I don’t expect to love Philip Marlowe, but since this film is premised on a love story — Brendan is not hired to find Emily’s killer, he does it for the love of her — we need to see at least a hint of feeling. When we did, briefly, it came too late for me. In fact, the only moment which moved me was not Brendan’s but The Pin’s: sitting on the beach with his back turned, he tries to express a love (for reading Tolkien, of all things). Just that attempt was enough to ally me with him for the rest of the picture, despite his rotten deeds. Early on, we see Brendan and his friend ‘The Brain’ — a sort of ‘Deep Throat’ of useful information — idly solve a Rubik Cube as they discuss potential leads. A Rubik Cube is only interesting while you’re trying to solve it; once solved, it’s just a paperweight. Brick is captivating, but not memorable.

THE SPECTATOR13 May 2006 54

Radio Comic timing Michael Vestey

How quaint the wave of alternative comedy of the 1980s seems now. It began at the Comedy Store in Soho just two weeks after Margaret Thatcher first became prime minister and was largely an attack on her and her government. That’s why it then seemed to me so utterly predictable and dull and much of it not even funny. Clive Anderson was one of those early stand-up comedians, and in Margaret Thatcher Ha Ha Ha on Radio Four (Saturday) he talked to some of the others about the nature of a movement — for that’s what it was — united by a loathing of the prime minister and her policies. Not quite everyone was a leftist, but right-wing humour wasn’t allowed. One of the comics, Tony Allen, described himself as having a squatter lifestyle, part of an anarcho-libertarian, hippy counter-culture. Anderson was a lawyer; another, Arnold Brown, was an accountant. Fellow performer Oliver Double thought that when a leader is ‘very dogmatic and powerful and making radical changes to society’ politics came to the fore. He thought Thatcher was ‘nuts’. Alexei Sayle, who came from a communist background, thought she was ‘very ogreish; she made a wonderful target as a very distinctive person. It would have been very different without her.’ Pauline Melville, a feminist comic at the time, said, ‘She was a reactionary old cow, so fair game absolutely.’ Another, Jenny Lecoat, recalled, ‘What was useful was that we had one person that we universally hated so much and that not only all the comedians but most of the audience hated as well, and there’s nothing more effective at

‘Shopping it may be — a spree it certainly ain’t.’

bringing an audience together than having a go at somebody we...hate.’ Ben Elton thought of the 1980s as a confrontational decade, the post-war consensus was ending and there were radical changes taking place. He’d found the politics of the period fascinating. Andy de la Tour was apparently the most determinedly political of them all, even telling a joke about Airey Neave who was murdered by what Anderson called Irish terrorists. The last isn’t a word you normally hear on the radio these days. Usually, the mealymouthed BBC calls them militants, as if they were just a touch on the extreme side. For Melville, it was entirely the politics that motivated her; she had no intention of making a career out of being a comedian. Racist and sexist jokes were outlawed, though clearly they made an exception for Margaret Thatcher, about whom anything could be said. Clearly, some women didn’t count. The Comedy Store was started by Peter Rosengard, who was in fact an insurance salesman, and the owner of the premises, a strip club, was Don Ward. The idea was to copy the Comedy Store in Los Angeles. Rosengard wanted to create something different and new. Sayle observed that in that atmosphere you had at least to pretend to be left-wing. The irony is that the alternative comedians had driven out the comics who used to make jokes about the motherin-law, and yet, as someone, whose name I didn’t catch, said, Thatcher was ‘always being characterised in rather sexist terms, a bitch and a cow and things like that. She became a sort of left-wing mother-in-law ...’ Sayle noticed another irony, that the new breed of college-educated comedians also killed off many of the old workingclass comics from the northern clubs. The Guardian ’s comedy critic, William Cook — also, it seems, an historian of British comedy — said, ‘In the end I don’t think the comics ever got to the bottom of what Thatcher was about, why the socalled C2s, Essex man. . . were voting for her in big numbers. There was a kind of bewilderment, a blank incomprehension. . . How had this woman managed to get so many people to vote for her? I don’t think the comics ever sat down to address this.’ Double believed that before alternative comedy it was commonplace to be casually racist, so ‘it did change the face of light entertainment’. Looking back, de la Tour saw the world in turmoil: ‘Cometh the hour, cometh the gags.’ Anderson, though, couldn’t help wondering if Thatcher had had the last laugh. An entertaining programme, though I must say the jokes recorded at the time now sound utterly feeble, but the audience had laughed because they had wanted to. Thatcher was an affront to their beliefs. No other prime minister has polarised public opinion in such a way, but she was something that much of the country sensed Britain needed to halt the long decline.