BIOGRAPHY

MALISE RUTHVEN

R e b e l w i t h a C a u s e SAYYID QUTB AND THE ORIGINS OF

RADICAL ISLAMISM

★

By John Calvert (Hurst & Co 377pp £25)

from the multivolume Quranic commentary he wrote dur ing the better part of a decade that he spent in Nasser’s prisons – deserves to be recognised as one of the most influential revolutionary tracts produced in the twentieth century. As Calvert comments, ‘its diagnostic élan and call to action bear comparison with Lenin’s What is to be Done?’ Muhammad Atta, the Egyptian architect who led the murderous airborne attacks on New York and Washington on 9/11, assuredly had read it. Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden’s deputy and widely considered the ‘brains’ behind al-Qaeda, has explicitly acknowledged that Qutb’s message (which he regards as identical to that of Islam itself) ‘fanned the fire of Islamic revolution against the enemies of Islam at home and abroad’. Not that this means that Qutb would have approved of 9/11. More rooted in Islamic piety than Atta or al-Zawahiri, he would not, as Calvert argues,

IN NAGUIB MAHFOUZ’S semi-autobiographical novel Mir r o r s , the winner of the 1988 Nobel Pr i ze for Literature sketched a character named Abd al-Wahhab Ismail. It is generally regarded as a portrait of Sayyid Qutb. Ismail is a ‘polite convers a t ionalist’, s e l f -assured and even-tempered. He never s peaks about re l i g i on. He adopts European habits in food and dress, and enjoys going to the cinema. But his apparent e s pousal o f moder n i t y i s a façade. Beneath the exterior of a typical middle-class Egyptian effendi-cum-man about town, Mahfouz discer ns something disturbing, even sinister:

have sanctioned the methods of extreme violence

Qutb: no great frequenter of nightclubs that Atta and his ter ror i st co l l e a gues employed; a s Qutb had pointed out in his writings the killing of innocents finds no justification in t he Quran. Nor would Qutb have understood alQaeda’s desire to attack a Wester n power i n s uch a f a s h i on . I n h i s mind t he jihad against taghut (idolatrous tyranny) at home was always paramount. However, he would h ave h a d l i t t l e trouble understanding the logic of their purpose. For in the September 11 attacks the hijacker s underscored

I was never comfor t able with his face or the look in his bulging, serious eyes … I was disturbed by his opportunistic side, doubting his integrity. A permanent revulsion, despite our friendship, settled in my heart. On the cover of John Calvert’s book, those ‘bulging, serious eyes’ stare from behind prison bars. For radically minded Muslims, this image of Qutb the martyr – taken shortly before his execution in 1966 – has the iconic charge of Alberto Korda’s celebrated photograph of Che Guevara. The Islamic Republic has even used it on postage stamps – demonstrable proof of the esteem in which Iran’s revolutionary ayatollahs hold the Muslim Brotherhood’s most famous and influential intellectual. Were Mahfouz’s instincts sound? Was he justified in doubting Qutb’s integr ity? Calvert’s biography – the product of both painstaking research into the Arabic sources and an impressive grasp of modern history and culture – presents a rounded picture of a man who, more than any other figure, both epitomised and articulated the cause of political Islam. Qutb’s pamphlet – variously translated as Milestones or Signposts, and excerpted the same point that he made in his prison writings: that the World, as it stands, constitutes a conceptual realm of irreligion and vice that ought to be resisted in the name of God. The great strength of this book lies in the plausible, non-judgemental way that Calvert charts Qutb’s trajectory from his rural roots in Upper Egypt, by way of his membership of Cairo’s literary elite in the 1930s and 1940s and his brief involvement with the Free Officers who overthrew the monarchy in 1952, through to his membership of the Muslim Brotherhood and execution for his participation in a planned armed insurgency in 1966.

Before the revolution he had a respectable job as an inspector in the ministry of education. Many commentators, myself included, have focused on his visit to America in 1949–50 on a generous Egyptian government grant to study the country’s educational methods. Contrary to the intentions of his superiors, the visit

LITERARY REVIEW April 2011

4