Full refund within 30 days if you're not completely satisfied.
2 Bloomsbury Place, London ¬®1¯ 2°¯ Publishing 020 7255 1281 Editorial 020 7255 1344 Fax 020 7255 1279 Email firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com Website www.prospect-magazine.co.uk Editorial Editor and chief executive Bronwen Maddox Editor at large David Goodhart Deputy editor James Elwes Politics editor James Macintyre Senior editor Susha Ireland Creative director David Killen Assistant editor David Wolf Production assistant Ollie Cussen Web intern Laura Marsh Editorial assistants: Rudy Katoch, William Irwin, Daniel Cohen Publishing President & co-founder Derek Coombs Publisher David Hanger Circulation marketing director Jamie Wren Digital marketing: Tim De La Salle Advertising sales director Iain Adams, Tel: 020 7255 1934 Advertising sales manager Dan Jeﬀerson, Tel: 020 7255 1934 Advertising sales Chris Anson, Tel: 01424 838 855 Finance manager Pauline Joy Editorial advisory board David Cannadine, Clive Cowdery, Jonathan Ford, AC Grayling, Peter Hall, John Kay, Nader Mousavizadeh, Toby Mundy, Jean Seaton Associate editors Tom Chatfield, James Crabtree, Andy Davis, Ed Docx, David Edmonds, Sam Knight, Ian Irvine, Sam Leith, Alexander Linklater, Kamran Nazeer, Elizabeth Pisani, Wendell Steavenson, James Woodall Contributing editors Philip Ball, Anthony Dworkin, Catherine Fieschi, Josef Joﬀe, Anatole Kaletsky, Michael Lind, Joy Lo Dico, Oliver Morton, Alex Renton, Erik Tarloﬀ Annual subscription rates UK £49; Student £27 Europe £55; Student £32.50 Rest of the World £59.50; Student £35 Prospect Subscriptions, 800 Guillat Avenue, Kent Science Park, Sittingbourne, ·¸9 8¹º Tel 0844 249 0486; 44(0)1795 414 957 Fax 01795 414 555 Email firstname.lastname@example.org Website www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/subscribe Cheques payable to Prospect Publishing Ltd. Subscription refunds must be made in writing to Prospect within four weeks of a new order or renewal, and are subject to an administration charge of £15. No refunds are paid on quarterly subscriptions.
The views represented in this magazine are not necessarily those of Prospect Publishing Ltd. Best endeavours have been taken in all cases to represent faithfully the views of all contributors and interviewees. The publisher accepts no responsibility for errors, omissions or the consequences thereof. Newstrade distribution Comag Specialist, Tavistock Road, West Drayton, º¼7 7°¸, Tel: 01895 433716 Images Cover image: Bert Hardy Cartoons by: The Surreal McCoy, Joseph Farris, Russell, KJ Lamb, Chris Madden, Nick, Bill Proud Additional design: Jennifer Owens ISSN: 13595024
Britain’s quiet revolution
The national poll carried out for Prospect by YouGov has delivered an astonishing result: 74 per cent of people think that Britain spends too much on welfare and should cut benefits. That represents a revolution in attitudes in just a few decades, never mind in the century since the beginnings of the modern welfare state.
Does that represent a hardening of hearts? Is it a nationwide lurch to the political right? Not really. People are not against the welfare state itself. They clearly regard the principles of the system put in place in 1906, and developed by William Beveridge 70 years ago, as intertwined with British values. They want to keep its protections for the poorest and weakest—specifically, the elderly and the disabled. Any politician who ignored that message would be foolish.
But a huge majority has lost faith, as Peter Kellner, president of YouGov, puts it, that politicians are giving the right money to the right people for the right reasons. People are suspicious of illegal immigrants, of single parents, and in a cascade of pejoratives, of “scroungers,” the “feckless” and the “workshy.” As Peter Kellner notes, the postwar system was “created in an era of near-full employment where seven out of ten Britons were working class, few of whom paid income tax, and where those who lived long enough to reach retirement age generally died not long aœer.” There is a strong sense now that we are not all in this together. David Goodhart (p36) attributes this decline in solidarity partly to the growth in diversity. David Davis, in a powerful attack on crony capitalism (p24), argues that ordinary people feel leœ behind.
Pronouncing that other people should receive less in benefits, or should pay more tax, is hardly a new human reflex, as Nick Carn drily points out in a letter (p12) in response to last month’s cover story, “Tax the Aged.” That story provoked a storm, as our letters pages show. Many furiously argued that they had paid taxes all their lives and deserved the pensions and other benefits they had long been promised and were now enjoying. Others ruefully acknowledged the force of the argument (Prospect, February) by Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, which springs from simple arithmetic about the implications of an ageing population, a question now overshadowing western democracies. The US presidential campaign has so far produced few answers, amid an astonishing shower of pronouncements about the nation’s decline (p28).
But it is not all gloom. Our poll suggests a possible compromise between voters and governments, through which adept politicians may manage to scramble, although how long public opinion will remain solid is another question. People want an overhaul of welfare, which targets benefits more narrowly onto those they feel are truly deserving. Few rush to defend universal benefits going to more aﬄuent pensioners or higher-rate taxpayers. That is a demand not to jettison the welfare state, but to return to the central principles on which it was founded.
MARCH · PROSPECT ·