Full refund within 30 days if you're not completely satisfied.
the Friend INDEPENDENT QUAKER JOURNALISM SINCE 1843
CONTENTS – VOL 168 NO 27 3-4 News 3 Quakers defend BP investment 4 ‘It is a budget lacking in compassion’ 5 The future of education? Janice Fletcher Jeal 6 The new Scrooges John West 7 On being a Quaker in business David Amos 8-9 Letters 10-12 Power and peace Jean Zaru 13 The shadows of creation Ken Veitch 14 Letting go and taking up Peggy Heeks 15 Quaker Quest: if we can do it… Jim Samson 16 Q-eye 17 Friends & Meetings
Cover image: An excerpt from Jean Zaru’s acceptance speech on being awarded the Anna Lindh prize. Photo: ChrisYunker/flickr CC. Images on this page: Two Quaker banners at demonstrations in London (top) and Manchester (bottom). See page 16. Top photo: fotologic/flickr CC:BY. Bottom photo: BinaryApe/flickr CC:BY.
The Friend Subscriptions: new prices from 1 July 2010
UK Rest of World
The Friend (year)
by monthly direct debit £6.50 per month The Friends Quarterly (year) £20 £22 Both (combined) (year) £90 £114 by monthly direct debit £7.50 per month Quaker Chaplains £55 Internet – only (year) £48 £48
Contact Penny Dunn on
020 7663 1178 or firstname.lastname@example.org to subscribe. Alternatively visit our website www.thefriend.org to order your subscription.
the Friend 173 Euston Road, London NW1 2BJ Tel: 020 7663 1010 Fax: 020 7663 1182 www.thefriend.org Editor: Ian Kirk-Smith email@example.com • Production editor: Jez Smith firstname.lastname@example.org • Sub-editor: Trish Carn email@example.com • News reporter: Symon Hill firstname.lastname@example.org • Arts editor: Rowena Loverance email@example.com • Environment editor: Laurie Michaelis firstname.lastname@example.org • Subscriptions officer: Penny Dunn email@example.com Tel: 020 7663 1178 • Advertisement manager: George Penaluna, Ad department, 54a Main Street, Cononley, Keighley BD20 8LL Tel: 01535 630230 firstname.lastname@example.org • Clerk of the trustees: A David Olver • ISSN: 0016-1268 The Friend Publications Limited is a registered charity, number 211649 • Printed by Headley Bros Ltd, Queens Road, Ashford, Kent TN24 8HH
the Friend, 2 July 2010 News
Quakers defend BP investment
An oiled gannet is cleaned at the Theodore Oiled Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre on 17 June, 2010. The centre in Theodore is one of four wildlife rehabilitation centres established in support of the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill response.
Britain Yearly Meeting (BYM) has defended its investment of over half a million pounds in BP. BYM, the organisation of Quakers across England, Scotland and Wales, has a higher proportion of its investments in the oil giant than in any other business.
BYM say it has engaged with BP on issues such as renewable energy. But the World Development Movement (WDM) urged Friends to consider selling their shares in the light of BP’s role in ‘fuelling climate change’.
BP is one of the world’s largest transnational oil companies, with shares owned by pension funds and other groups in the UK. Since hitting the headlines over the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, over $40bn has been wiped off the firm’s value. Rathbone Greenbank, who manages BYM’s investments, is reviewing BP holdings for all their clients.
Kate Blagojevic of WDM welcomed the fact that ‘a lot of Quakers have supported WDM campaigns’. She said it was, therefore, ‘really important that at a national level the Quakers put their money where their ethics are’.
But BYM says that it is having a positive effect on BP. Roger Morton, clerk of BYM’s Investment SubCommittee of Quaker Finance & Property, said that fund managers are issued with a ‘detailed ethical investment mandate’ and have ‘engaged with the company on three key issues: oil sands exploration; links between executive remuneration and health and safety; and investment in UK renewables’.
Greenpeace told the Friend that BP’s level of spending on renewable energy has recently gone down. Roger Morton acknowledged that it is ‘undoubtedly still a small part of its overall business’, but insisted that BP’s spending on alternative energy ‘has not been matched by other companies in the sector, and is a key aspect in any balanced view of the company’.
Ethically minded shareholders used BP’s annual general meeting in April to table a resolution on tar sands exploration, a form of obtaining oil thought to be around three times more carbon intensive than conventional oil extraction methods. The process is also alleged to have damaged the health of local communities due to toxic by-products leaking into water sources.
The rebel resolution was backed by BYM, along with the Methodist Church and a number of Anglican and Catholic funds. A spokesperson for Rathbone Greenbank said that the engagement was ‘successful, as the company was forced into making public disclosures on its plans for oil sands development’.
Louise Rouse of the ethical investment campaign Fair Pensions welcomed BYM’s support for the resolution, while urging Quakers to continue to ‘use the power that they have as a shareholder’ to scrutinise the company and ‘reduce environmental and social risk’.
Some are less optimistic about critical engagement. Kate Blagojevic of WDM suggested that: ‘Unless BYM are prepared to use their shares for the strongest possible shareholder action, then divestment from BP is the only ethical stance available.’
Wh lin lass Co cpett y officer 3rd photo
Symon Hill Photo the Friend, 2 July 2010