Subscriptions to The Spectator
Full refund within 30 days if you're not completely satisfied.
page:
contents page
previous next
zoom out zoom in
thumbnails double page single page large double page
fit width
clip to blog
Open which.co.uk Call +448448443852 Open panasonic.co.uk/sd600 click to zoom in Look up postcode SW1H 9HP Call +442079610250 Open www.spectator.co.uk Open www.spectator.co.uk Call +442079610200 click to zoom in
page:
contents page
previous next
zoom out zoom in
thumbnails double page single page large double page
fit width
clip to blog

THREE FULL HD SENSORS FOR MORE COLOURFUL MEMORIES.

When something incredible happens, you’ll want to relive it in as much clarity as possible. That’s why the Panasonic SD600 lets you record in full HD straight to SD card, and has three separate full HD colour sensors – for stunning detail and true-to-life colour, even in low light. Intelligent auto makes it easier than ever to save those precious moments quickly, while face recognition ensures you can always focus on what matters most to you. Because capturing the moment matters.

EVERYTHING MATTERS.

BESTAUDIO VISUALBRAND

which.co.uk

AWARDS 2010

See why three sensors are better than one at panasonic.co.uk/sd600

0844 844 3852 The Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London SW1H 9HP Telephone 020 7961 0200; Fax 020 7961 0250; www.spectator.co.uk

Who benefits?

The cries of unfairness which have gone up in reaction to George Osborne’s assault on the £12.5 million annual bill for disability benefits are a sign of just how ingrained the welfare culture has become among Britain’s workshy millions. They are also an indication of how hard the Chancellor will have to battle against the assortment of quangos and charities which stick up for their rights to taxpayer-funded lives of leisure.

It is a mark of just how absurd the incapacity benefit had become that even the Labour government at the height of its Keynesian spending splurge decided enough was enough. In October 2008 it replaced Incapacity Benefit with Employment Support Allowance (ESA) and subjected claimants to a tougher eligibility test called the Work Capability Assessment (WCA). For example, an inability to bend down on to your knees was no longer accepted as a reason why you can’t sit in an office chair.

The results were astounding. Out of 352,500 assessments carried out between October 2008 and May 2009, only 18,100 claimants, or 5 per cent, were judged to be incapable of working at all. Twelve per cent were judged to be capable of doing some work, and were put on a programme to help them find it. Thirty-eight per cent were judged to be fully fit for work,

and were moved on to Jobseeker’s Allowance, and a further 38 per cent of claimants ceased claiming while being assessed — no doubt realising that their days of malingering were over.

Yet even more astounding was the fact that in spite of the new tests, the number of claimants for disability benefits kept rising. In the year to April the number of people claiming either the old incapacity benefit or ESA rose by 12,880 to 2.62 million. It is hard to escape the conclusion that most of these people should really be added to the roll of the unemployed — the current figure for which, 1.48 million, flatters the state of the economy.

Disability benefits have become a scam perpetrated by governments of both colours since the 1980s. Stung by unemployment figures, Mrs Thatcher’s administration was only too happy to see people moved off unemployment benefit and on to incapacity benefit. The claimants were happy too, given that disability benefits paid them more: ESA is worth between £89.50 and £108.55 a week, compared with £65 a week for Jobseeker’s Allowance.

Over the next three years all current claimants of Incapacity Benefit will be reassessed using the WCA. This should exert downward pressure on claims, but it is not enough. Two reforms are needed to put an end to the dis-

ability benefits scam for good. First, ESA should be lowered to the same level as Jobseeker’s Allowance, ending the incentive to get ‘put on the sick’. If genuinely ill people need money to help them overcome specific conditions, this should be granted according to need; not through an indiscriminate extra allowance.

Second, the government should stop publishing increasingly meaningless unemployment figures and instead publish a figure for economic inactivity, which includes all people of working age who are out of work for whatever reason. At present this figure stands at a shocking 8.19 million — one in five of the working population — and has increased by 298,000 over the past year.

There is no magic solution to Britain’s welfare culture, but one announcement from Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith this week shows promise: he wants social housing tenants to have greater rights to exchange their tenancies. Too many people, he observes, are trapped by their council house tenancies in areas of high unemployment. We are not going to get the unemployed into work unless it becomes easier for them to move around the country to make the most of the opportunities on offer. The sooner the ghettos of the hereditary unemployed and chronically ‘incapacitated’ are broken up, the better.

Passion play

Following England’s dismal World Cup defeat to Germany on Sunday, the nation’s football pundits struck up a familiar refrain: our boys lacked passion. This is something of an English obsession: players win because they play with pride; they lose when they don’t show enough commitment. Talent is for foreigners, the English are meant to play with heart.

But passion is overrated; too often just code for a lack of discipline. Time and time again, the most ‘passionate’ players let their country down. On Sunday, the England players most often commended for their fighting spirit, Wayne Rooney and John Terry, were the team’s worst performers. They ran around the pitch screaming at their teammates and the referees, but failed to do anything useful with the ball. In their determination to appear passionate in front of the cameras, they failed to concentrate on the game. It’s convenient for us to accept the lie that all our boys need is chutzpah — the truth is crueller: English football needs less passion and more skill. The trouble with the team was not that they didn’t care, just that they weren’t good enough.

www.spectator.co.uk

THE SPECTATOR 3 July 2010 3