Editor Fromthe

The Tory MP Frederick Edwin Smith, best mate of Winston Churchill, and well-known for his use of sarcasm, once said of an oponent: “The arguments he produces in his election addres will win no more votes than his photograph on the front cover.” Thankfully, the electability of our politicians doesn’t revolve around how good-looking they are. But, as elsewhere in life, when a particularly photogenic figurehead emerges they stand out from the crowd. Our cover star Chuka Umunna is a very dapper man who knows how to wear a well-cut suit. As our coverline asks, has he got the substance to go with the style? Our interview on p50 reveals that he is meeting with Tony Blair, the master at understanding the power of style in politics. Despite Blair’s rather mixed reputation among the modern Parliamentary Labour Party, Umunna is completely unapologetic about his discussions with the former PM. Interestingly, Umunna cites Michael Heseltine as another influence. Umunna appears to be triangulating as he settles into his shadow business brief, by talking to the chief of New Labour and one of the Conservatives’ ‘big beasts’. He obviously draws comfort and inspiration from these two mentors, as he develops the balance between Ed Miliband’s predator-producer argument while fighting against any efforts to dismiss Labour as anti-business. Talking to a shadow minister recently about the PLP, he told me: “The political gravity of the Labour Party is entirely centred around the 2010 intake.” Labour young guns like Umunna are developing as politicians as fast as they can. Just as the 2001 and 2005 Conservative intakes are wondering if they will ever be noticed, so are the older guard in Labour as Ed Miliband’s attention focuses on his newer cohort. Dan Hodges explores this in his column on p16. As we reach the second half of this coalition government’s term in power, Umunna has a golden opportunity to build substantial business policies for Labour. It’s clear the ambition is there. Now we’ll see if he can match it with ability.

en Duckworth • Editor | editor@totalpolitics.com

Editor Ben Duckworth Political Editor Amber Elliott Staff Writer Caroline Crampton Art Direction and Design Antonello Sticca CHIEF EXECUTIVE Shane Greer Books Editor Keith Simpson MP Contributing Editors Lisa Nandy MP, Rob Wilson MP, Stephen Gilbert MP, JB Seatrobe, Andrew Hawkins Resources Director John Simmons Advertising Director Jeremy Halley dd: 020 7091 1261 jeremy.halley@totalpolitics.com Advertising Manager Sue Reynolds dd: 020 3167 1319 sue.reynolds@totalpolitics.com Strategic Partner ComRes Publisher Iain Dale hEAD OF Events Silvana Fabbrini Events & Production Executive Henry Rubinstein

Photography Getty Images and iStockphoto, unless stated otherwise.

Our address Westminster Tower 3 Albert Embankment London, SE1 7SP Email firstname.lastname@totalpolitics.com Editorial 020 7091 1260 editor@totalpolitics.com

Advertising 020 7091 1261 advertising@totalpolitics.com Subscriptions 01778 392023 subscriptions@warnersgroup.co.uk

Published by Biteback Media Limited registered office: 17 Marina Court Castle Street Hull, HU1 1TJ Biteback Media is a limited company, registered in England. Company number 06455159

Distributor Seymour Distribution 2 East Poultry Avenue London, EC1A 9PT 020 7429 4000 conrad.cornelius@seymour.co.uk Newstrade Select Publisher Services 3 East Avenue Bournemouth, BH3 7BW 01202 586848 tim@selectps.com

Printed by Warners, Peterborough

© 2012 Biteback Media Limited. Reproduction in whole or part of any article is prohibited without prior written consent. Articles written by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the organisation.

ISSN 1757 - 0492

On the cover Chuka Umunna photographed exclusively for Total Politics by Paul Rider on 26 March 2012 at the Houses of Parliament, London.

Innocenti

Emma

4 | May 2012 | Total Politics Inbox

Send your letters by email to editor@totalpolitics.com or by post to: Westminster Tower, 3 Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7SP

I f y o u w o ul dli k e y o u r l e t t e r p r i n t e d,

pl e a s eli mititto1

5 0

w o r d s.

T o t al P oliticsreservestheri g h t t o e ditl e t t e r s.

A transport legacy Congratulations on a fascinating interview with Justine Greening (TP, April). It certainly highlighted her thinking on many of the topical transport issues, such as motorway speed and the Olympics. Her reaffirmation of the commitment to press ahead with rail investment and reforms will be welcome to all of us who wish rail to be as successful in the next decade as it has been in the last. Moreover, I detected a realisation that the UK needed a long-term solution to aviation capacity, which would be economically and environmentally viable as well as future-proofed.

However, the most reassuring remark was that Greening claimed “that the Department for Transport is slap bang in the middle of what the government is trying to do in getting the economy back on its feet”. In the past, transport watchers will testify that potential for DfT to drive economic and social objectives was underrecognised. If DfT under Greening can be seen as one of the leads on economic policy, then that will be a ministerial legacy worth having. Stephen Hammond MP Joint chair, APPG on rail Greening’s challenge Justine Greening (TP, April) obviously spins optimism in regard to the future of the rail network. She is, of course, concentrating on the south, and that is understandable. However, the grim reality is that there is a lot of customer dissatisfaction up north with regard to the above-inflation rise in the cost of rail tickets and the persistent overcrowding on trains. My experience pertains to the Manchester to Lancaster service that is bound for Glasgow at the weekend, but I would guess that many other services have the same issue. Overcrowding on trains on a weekly basis smacks of poor customer service and planning. To add insult to injury, rail users are being forced to pay more for their rail travel without any signs of improvements to services.

I would like to challenge Justine Greening and Norman Baker to gain a true insight into the problems that are afflicting the rail service. I would like them to join me on a journey between Manchester and Lancaster at peak time and for them to see the disorganisation, lack of seating and the health and safety issues. The solution – investing in more carriages – is common sense but that is currently lacking from the higher echelons of the rail network. Cllr David Whitaker Labour, Lancaster City Council Old New Labour After Andy Burnham spent a year swinging wildly at Michael Gove but with only occasional contact, Stephen Twigg’s arrival as shadow education secretary brought a much more conciliatory approach, at least to the government. Stephen’s provocations seem entirely aimed at the leftist educational establishment, rather than the Tories. In his interview (TP, April), he says he wants greater involvement of private business with and in schools and doesn’t think it has to be the state that directly provides. Much more Tony Blair than Red Ed.

He is focused on raising standards not playing tribal politics, which is smart politics. By treating free schools on their individual merits he allows Labour to embrace them and woo their parents’ votes. Distance from the teaching unions gives him freedom of manoeuvre depending on how Gove’s reforms work out. If there’s room for a Blairite in Miliband’s Labour, then Twigg is one to watch. Graham Stuart MP Chair of the education select committee

An English identity Responding to Sadiq Khan’s excellent article on Britishness,Englishnessand Identity (TP, April), it is important to ask why English identity has risen. We all carry identities and loyalties to communities, ethnicities, teams, the nation, or communities around the world. But it is only at certain times that we find one identity a powerful way of describing ourselves and our collective interests.

National identities usually strengthen when people feel hard done by. Today’s English identity reflects a growing sense that English people lack a real voice on the things that matter to them, as the IPPR report that Sadiq refers to shows clearly. Worse, they feel they are losing out and being treated less fairly than others.

English Labour needs to respond to this perception – justified or not – by bringing an English dimension to our cultural, economic, political and democratic policies. We should also acknowledge our own English identity, starting by letting candidates stand as English Labour alongside our colleagues who stand as Welsh and Scottish Labour. John Denham MP Labour MP for Southampton Itchen

In praise of free schools Free schools are all about parents and groups wanting to establish new schools to meet parental demand to improve choice and quality. The work behind setting one up and the motivation to do so is proof of the appetite for them in certain areas, particularly with failing schools.

Good governance is part of the story of free schools as it must become so for all schools. The role and selection of school governors is now on the agenda as accountability issues come into sharper focus because of increasing school autonomy. This has been underlined by recent comments by Sir Michael Wilshaw, chief inspector of Ofsted. Free schools are here to stay, proving the value of strong leadership and effective governance in delivering high quality outcomes for pupils. They will be a reminder of the value of challenging assumptions. Neil Carmichael MP Education select committee member and chair of the APPG for education leadership and government

The pick of ONLINE comments from TotalPolitics.com u Amber Elliott’s MPsTryTo Overturn ‘GodCanHeal’AdBan provoked a very lively debate online. N S said: “If people want to believe in the power of prayer then that is their right to do so. We are supposedly an intelligent nation that can make informed decisions for ourselves, so when presented with the idea that prayer can heal, surely we should be able to make our own informed choices on whether we personally want to belief it.” Duncan Moore commented: “What a shame to see Tim Farron’s name in there. He’d always seemed like a reasonable person but evidently I was mistaken. In any case, there are papers that definitively show prayer is no more effective than placebo. These MPs have done nothing more than make fools of themselves.”

u Commenting on Martin Shapland’s blog ADireWeekForThe Conservatives AndADisasterForLabour, Anna Chen wrote: “Yup, that just about sums it up. I was going to write a summary but yours has done the job very well. The only thing that I’m uncomfortable with is capitulating to the use of the term ‘narrative’. When did that come in? Which wonk did the Robert McKee story course?”

u Jonathan Clarke took issue with Gavin Devine’s blog Cameron’s IsALobbyingScandal WithoutLobbyists. He said: “I’m not quite clear why you focus so much on professional lobbyists (making the argument that they weren’t the cause of this particular humiliation of our political process) when they aren’t relevant to the story, as you say. Then I note your role at the bottom of the article...”

u Dr Bridget Price agreed with Sheila Gilmore MP’s article HowCanWeFairlyAssessPeople’s Capability ForWork? She said: “I have written to ATOS and to the DWP and detailed some of the reasons why the tests are not appropriate and how they might change them. My emails have just been totally ignored. It seems they have no wish to do the job properly.”

u John Scott disagreed with on Dylan Sharpe’s blog Adversarial Politics Is Exactly WhatWeNeed. He said: “I moan about the way MPs act. And I read the manifestos of all the parties standing in my constituency at every election. It’s the responsible thing to do. So either I’m a politico (as I dislike politics and politicians, I doubt it) or at least one person doesn’t fit the argument here. “While we’re complaining – could politicians trying to talk about policy do so in an intelligent way, rather than preaching disaster and standing outside Greggs? I am still waiting for someone, anyone, to explain why taxing pasties in the way other hot foods are taxed is a bad thing, which seems to be the level of debate which politicians think the public understand.” ■

Total Politics | May 2012 | 5

Total Politics | May 2012 | 5