the philosophers’

magazine issue 32 • 4th quarter 2005

reporter 4news hound news, plus straw poll and mediawatch

11word of mouse games can make war, but not love

34stoic warriors Nancy Sherman on modern soldiers and an old ideal

39the secret Jew did Wittgenstein have a hidden agenda?

the lowdown 77the directory listings for UK and North America

78snapshotthelowdown on Peter Singer

12who’s Hume? why the great Scot is unappreciated in his home country

14omnivoreanewcolumn by Scott McLemee

15limb loathers should healthy limbs be amputated if their owners request it?

thoughts 18from 9/11-7/7 after Iraq and London, six writers revisit our 2001 forum

27sci-phididPopper put his theory into practice?

29friendsMarkVernonwondersiffriendship is up to our demands of it

33provocationsshouldthewaronterrorbelowerdownourlistofpriorities?

forum 46Oliver Letwin a Conservative view of social justice

50the general will Tony McWalter looks to Rousseau

55just association Norman Geras goes international

59equalityrethinking what it means to be equal

64democracyKeithDowding on the majority v. justice

68the real world Stuart White gets empirical in Stockport discussion 72my philosophy Joan Bakewell

74open debate your chance to debate affirmative action

80theory of knowledge the seventh in the introductory series examines testimony

83conceptualcarverydistinguishingthenecessaryandthecontingent review 84new books Blackburn, Hampshire and other worthy destinations last words 90Bertrand’sbreakfunandgames

93lettershavingevenmoreofyoursaythanusual

96the skeptic flabby thinking on lard arses subscriptions & TPM shop page 44

The Philosophers' Magazine/4th quarter 2005 One reason why we don’t see more philosophers opining in the newspapers and the popular media is that they often steadfastly refuse to give the press the cut-and-dried, straightforward and preferably polarised soundbites they require. As the old joke about a protest of philosophers goes, their cry is “What do we want? A proper and measured debate! When do we want it? At the appropriate time!” You can forgive circulation chasing editors for not leaping on that story.

However, many of the articles in this issue provide reminders that philosophers can say some pretty controversial things, which have the power to reinvigorate tired discussions. For instance, Richard Norman (p21) makes the grave charge that there is a moral equivalence between acts of terror and acts of war in which civilians are inevitably killed, such as the American-led invasion of Iraq. He’s not the first to accuse the US and Britain of criminal acts in Iraq, but when the case is made by measured reasoning rather the philosophers’

magazine

98 Mulgrave Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 6LZ, UK Tel: 020 8643 1504 Fax: 0709 237 6412 editor@philosophers.co.uk www.philosophers.co.uk Editors Julian Baggini (print edition)

Jeremy Stangroom (new media)

Deputy editor Ophelia Benson Reviews Editor Jonathan Derbyshire reviews@philosophers.co.uk

Contributing Editors Susan Dwyer, Simon Eassom, Peter Fosl, Michael LaBossiere, Jeff Mason, Christopher Norris, Christian Perring Illustrations/Graphics Felix Bennett (cover), Jerry Bird, Molly Crabapple, Pipo di Bressana, Michael LaBossiere, Gareth Southwell. Contributors’ Notes Contact the editor to submit proposals. Please do not send unsolicited manuscripts. Contributors Bat-Ami Bar On, Ranjit Chatterjee, Simon Clarke, Avner de-Shalit, Keith Dowding, Peter S Fosl, Nick Fotion, Norman Geras, Wendy Grossman, Joss Hands, Alan Haworth, Jennifer Hornsby, Mathew Iredale, Edward than shrill polemics, you have to pay attention.

Conservative politician and former philosopher Oliver Lewtin (p46) also expresses some surprising views, such as the fact that he broadly supports Rawlsian ideas of wealth distribution and that he can imagine circumstances in which sharing wealth more equally would be the top priority. Whether or not you agree with him, this is probably the most thoughtful interview you’ll see a politician give in a long time.

Yet as our interview with broadcaster Joan Bakewell (p72) shows, on the whole philosophers have not been too successful at adding their voices to society’s wider conversation about ideas and values – at least not in Britain.

The challenge of reaching out without dumbing-down or talking-down is a tough one. However, as books like Simon Blackburn’s Truth (reviewed on p84) show, top philosophers are no longer leaving it all to the pop philosophers to have a go.

Johnson, Sue Johnson, Michael LaBossiere, Joseph McCarney, Scott McLemee, Tony McWalter, Richard Norman, Beth Pearson, Duncan Pritchard, Jonathan Rée, Nancy Sherman, Mark Vernon, Jonathan Walmsley, Stuart White, Jonathan Wolff Distribution by (UK) Central Books, 99 Wallis Road, London E9 5LN Tel: 020 8986 4854 (North America) Ingram Periodicals Inc., 1240 Heil Quaker Blvd., La Vergne, TN 37086-7000; Tel: (615) 793 5522; Ubiquity Distributors Inc., 607 Degraw Street, Brooklyn, NY 11217 Tel: (718) 875 5491 Printed by Warwick Printing, Caswell Road, Leamington Spa CV31 1QD With thanks to Denis Collins, George Leaman, The Rainnies, Pam Swope. Subscriptions UK: 01442 879097 North America: 1 800 444 2419 See page 44 for full details

© 2005, The Philosophers’ Magazine and contributors

ISSN 1354-814X

All views expressed in The Philosophers’ Magazine represent those of the authors of each article and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors or publishers.

The Philosophers' Magazine/4th quarter 2005