Full refund within 30 days if you're not completely satisfied.
June 8 - 14 2011
μWorld News PAGES 14-17
μComment PAGES 18-21
μObituaries PAGES 22-23
μExpat Life PAGES 30-32
Child prodigy Three-year-old girl set to join Mensa with IQ score of 140
Time travel with the Bard Former Doctor Who shines in hit play with intelligence and heart
EXPAT LIFE P32
Duke of Edinburgh His exemplary life should be an inspiration to us all
Banging drum for the simple life Ex-Genesis member turned expat author on his books set in Spain
7 2 9 18 38 45 7 21 25 32 43 44
Bonus Ball 42
Bonus Ball 27
There were three winners of Saturday’s £4.4m jackpot and two winners of Wednesday’s £2.4m prize
μEDITORIAL OFFICE: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0DT. Tel (Int 44) 207 931 2000. Email email@example.com μADVERTISING: For details of local offices, contact Julie Bridge, Tel (44) 207 931 3290. Email firstname.lastname@example.org. For further information from any advertiser in this issue, please email your contact details, the advertiser(s) and issue date to email@example.com μSUBSCRIPTIONS: Weekly Telegraph Subscriptions, 3rd-4th Floor, Victory House, Meeting House Lane, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TT. Tel (44) 1622 335080. Fax (44) 1634 815163. (Office hours: 09.00-17.00 GMT.) Email firstname.lastname@example.org μDELIVERY INQUIRIES: Australia: Network Services. Contact MAGSHOP. Tel: 136 116. Email email@example.com Canada: Linda Hoefler. Tel 001 416 585 5856. Fax 001 416 585 5869. Email firstname.lastname@example.org Denmark: Bjarne Balle-Christiansen. Tel 0045 3327 7724. Fax: 0045 3296 8682. Email email@example.com Germany: Frank Blumhofer. Tel 0049 6105 925 573. Fax 0049 6157 804 599. Email firstname.lastname@example.org Hong Kong: Jeff Law. Tel 00 852 2756 8193. Fax 00 852 2799 8840. Email Jefflaw@foreignpress.com.hk Kenya: Shadrack Ochanda. Tel 0025 425 40280. Fax 0025 425 40295. Malaysia: Peter Lee. Tel (03) 7981 8563. Fax (03) 7981 9613. New Zealand: Netlink Subscriptions. Tel 0064 9 308 2871. Philippines: Denis Catangay. Tel 832 5383. Fax 831 3256. Email email@example.com Singapore: Doreen Tan. Tel 6282 1960. Fax 6382 3021.Email Doreen@carkitfe.com South Africa: Global News, 74 First Road, Kew 2090, South Africa. Tel: (011) 8872670/1. Fax 0865117067. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Thailand: Khun Tai. Tel (02) 887 3331. Fax (02) 887 2259. United States: Marlon Johnson. Tel 1800 933 2147. μNEWSSTAND INQUIRIES: The Publisher, 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0DT. Tel (44) (0) 20 7931 3447 Š The Weekly Telegraph (USPS#006819) is published weekly for US$218 a year by Telegraph Media Group Ltd, 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0DT, England. Periodicals postage paid at Newark, NJ. POSTMASTER: Send all address changes to The Weekly Telegraph, c/o SDS Global Logistics, 263 Frelinghuysen Ave, Newark, NJ 07114-1539.
μDATA PRIVACY: When you respond to Telegraph Media Group Limited’s competitions, offers or promotions, we may use your information for marketing purposes. We will contact you by mail or telephone to let you know about any of our special offers, products and services which may be of interest to you unless you have asked us not to. We will only contact you by email, text message, or similar electronic means with your permission. We will only pass your name on to third parties if you have consented for us to do so. In some cases our special offers, products and services may be provided, on our behalf, by our partners. If you have agreed to be contacted by us, your personal information may be passed to our partners; however, in all such cases we remain a data controller of your personal information. When responding to competitions, offers or promotions by postcard, if you do not wish for your details to be used by us to send you special offers, please make this clear by stating “No Offers”. We respect your data privacy. You may modify your preferences or get further information by writing to us at Data Privacy, Telegraph Customer Service, Victory House, Meeting House Lane, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TT or by email to data. email@example.com.
By Richard Gray Science Correspondent FOOD and drink sold in Britain is under a growing threat from terrorist groups which might try to poison supplies, the Government’s security advisers have warned.
Manufacturers and retailers have been told that their sector is vulnerable to attacks by ideologically and politically motivated groups that may seek to cause widespread casualties and disruption by poisoning food supplies.
The warning from the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure [CPNI], which operates as part of the Security Service, comes as experts warned the deadly E.coli outbreak in Germany has highlighted the vulnerability of the food chain and how quickly bacteria can spread. The highly virulent strain has claimed 22 lives and left around 2,000 ill.
A senior German doctor last Saturday night called for an investigation into the possibility that the bacteria had been spread deliberately.
Klaus-Dieter Zastrow, chief doctor for hygiene at Berlin’s Vivantes hospital, said: “It’s quite possible that there’s a crazy person out there who thinks ‘I’ll kill a few people or give 10,000 people diarrhoea’. It’s a negligent mistake not to investigate in that direction.”
In the past, the main threat of deliberate contamination of food has been from criminals attempting extortion or from individuals with a grudge, but security officials fear there is an emerging threat from extremist groups such as alQaeda, dissident republicans in Northern Ireland and animal rights activists.
The CPNI has asked food and drinks producers, suppliers and supermarkets to tighten security at plants and depots and to identify vulnerabilities in supply chains.
One official from the CPNI
spoke about the threat at a meeting of food safety experts. Addressing a conference of the Society for General Microbiology, he said: “The UK suffers from a low level of malicious contamination of food by the bad, the mad and the sad. Now it has to consider the possibility of food supplies being disrupted by politically motivated groups.”
The E.coli outbreak is thought to have been caused by poor hygiene at a farm, in transit, or at a food outlet.
Dr Richard Byrne, from the Centre for Rural Security at Harper Adams University College in Shropshire, said: “The outbreak in Germany very much highlights how we produce food, and how it is
The number of people killed by a highly virulent strain of E.colithat has struck Germany distributed is quite vulnerable in terms of agroterrorism.
“The impact on the German economy and fresh vegetable industry in general is huge. The US and Australia are much more publicly aware of the threat from terrorism to the food supply compared to the UK. Groups could go after consumer health in a shortterm way by using something like E.coli, or longer term by contaminating with cadmium or radioactive caesium.”
The CPNI report sent to companies in the food industry warns of a number of threats. Attackers could contaminate prepared food or drink with bacteria or chemicals. Or, by targeting basic ingredients used in large numbers of foods, they could cause even wider disruption.
US experts have warned that the dairy industry is particularly vulnerable, as adding just a few grams of botulinum toxin or ricin to a tanker load of milk could poison or even kill thousands of consumers.
The report warns that it is harder to guarantee the security of produce grown abroad and imported to Britain.
It adds that such attacks could cause severe economic harm. In one example, a major British producer of pastries was targeted by an attack where peanuts were introduced into a nut-free product. The factory was shut down for five days and products were removed from sale due to the risk of anaphylactic reactions from allergy sufferers. Police ruled out accidental causes and the company lost five per cent of its annual sales.
In February, a South African farmer was arrested after allegedly threatening to unleash foot and mouth disease in Britain. He was said to have believed that Britain was responsible for letting Robert Mugabe inflict losses on Zimbabwe’s farming industry.
The CPNI report warns: “The food and drink industry in the UK — the food sector of the national infrastructure — could be under threat from ideologically motivated groups. The threat is unlikely to decline in the foreseeable future. This could cause mass casualties, economic disruption and widespread panic.”
The report singles out farms as vulnerable because they often employ foreign workers, and urges all businesses to make comprehensive checks on new employees and visiting contractors.
In the US, food “bioterrorism” has become a major concern after documents were found in Afghanistan apparently referring to plans by terrorists to contaminate supplies.
By Harry Wallop FOOD and toy makers will no longer be allowed to pay children to promote their products at school or on social networking websites, David Cameron was due to announce on Monday.
The move is part of wideranging initiative to stem the commercialisation and sexualisation of children.
The Prime Minister has also welcomed a review, which looked into concerns that children were being pushed too hard and too fast into the adult, commercial world.
The report by Reg Bailey, the head of the Christian charity Mothers’ Union, covers the internet, clothes, television and advertising and was published on Monday. Major retailers will promise to stop selling high-heeled shoes, underwired bras and sheer tops for children younger than 12. Mr Cameron has already written to Mr Bailey saying he particularly welcomed three of the recommendations in the report.
The first was that billboards with sexual imagery should not be placed in locations where children are likely to see them.
The second was that children are protected when they watch television, are on the internet or use their mobile phones.
The third recommendation was to stop businesses from paying children to promote products in schools or on social networking sites.
The Telegraph has previously reported that more than 330,000 children, some as young as five, have been recruited to conduct market research for toy and gadget manufacturers. Most of the children are paid and some schools have earned £4,000 a year surveying pupils on the behalf of the firms.
Continued from page 1 Nicoletta Pabst, 41, said sanitary conditions at Hamburg-Eppendorf hospital were horrendous when she arrived with cramps and diarrhoea. She said at least 20 others in the emergency room had a similar condition.
“All of us had diarrhoea and there was only one bathroom each for men and women,” she said. “If I hadn’t been sick with E.coli by then, I probably would have picked it up over there.”
Bean sprouts, a common ingredient in salads and stirfried dishes, have been blamed for more than 40 food-born illnesses caused by either E.coli or salmonella bacteria over the past 35 years, including a serious outbreak of salmonella in Britain last year.
Canadian and American health officials have frequently given warnings about the dangers of sprouts. The largest such outbreak took place in Japan in 1996, when 6,000 people fell ill and 17 died after eating radish sprouts contaminated with the O157:H7 strain of E.coli.
The bacteria has been identified as a “completely new” mutant strain that is more infectious than usual varieties.
Prof Giuseppe Cornaglia, president of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, said: “This most recent E.coli epidemic, of a strain previously unseen in an outbreak, shows us yet again that … we are far from winning the fight against infectious diseases in Europe.
“It reminds us that we continue to face new challenges, and must ensure we are vigilant in our preparedness, including monitoring, detection, and speedy and appropriate treatment.”
Justin McCracken, the chief executive of the Health Protection Agency, reiterated the advice that travellers to Germany should avoid eating all salad. On The Andrew Marr Show on BBC One on Sunday, Mr McCracken said: “We are advising people who travel to Germany to avoid eating raw tomatoes, raw cucumbers and leafy salads, including lettuce.”
More than two million Britons travel to Germany each year. telegraph.co.uk/expat
T Going places? Hire a car in 175 countries with our online booking tool telegraph.co.uk/carhire
June 8 - 14 2011
By Andrew Porter Political Editor COUNCIL houses are to be taken away from rich tenants who earn more than £100,000, The Telegraph can disclose.
Ministers will target those who could afford to buy or rent a house comfortably but instead choose to live in a council house at vastly lower rents than those paid in the private sector.
For some London properties this amounts to the equivalent of someone having their rent subsidised by the taxpayer by up to £70,000 a year.
According to a Whitehall analysis prepared for ministers, there are up to 6,000 people in social housing with an income greater than £100,000.
Bob Crow makes no apology for living in social housing in spite of earning more than £140,000
A range of options is now being considered to free up this housing, which ministers say is being kept from those in need. These include granting new powers to councils, and the social landlords they control, to take homes away when it is clear that the income in the household is more than £100,000.
That would require changes to the law, but ministers are prepared to change it to demonstrate their commitment to reforming the way in which council houses are allocated.
A new law would mean that local authorities could order tenants to leave their home, and ultimately, if they refuse, be evicted.
Grant Shapps, the Housing Minister, told The Telegraph: “With so many people in housing need languishing on the waiting lists which doubled under Labour, it’s right to consider whether people on £100,000-plus salaries should get their rent subsidised by the taxpayer.”
Ministers are looking at the simplest way of assessing what tenants earn in order to establish who will face demands to give up council homes. It is understood that one way would be to use the existing tax system to enable officials to better assess a tenant’s financial circumstances.
However, it is likely that instead it will be up to the council or social housing landlord to make the assessment of income. Government sources say that the type of legal mechanism to allow this already exists in law, but it would be reenacted with new local government legislation to allow incomes of tenants to be accurately assessed.
On a large family house that could represent a saving of £200 a week compared to an equivalent property in the private sector.
In Westminster, the rent on an average four-bedroom council home would be around £137 per week. However, if the same property was rented privately it would be £1,600 a week. That amounts to a subsidy of £1,463 a week or £76,076 per annum.
There are four million council or housing association homes in England and Wales, providing homes for eight million people.
The Conservatives use the example of Frank Dobson, the Labour MP who was still living in his council house, despite being a Cabinet minister under Tony Blair and drawing a six-figure salary.
Bob Crow, the militant leader of the RMT union, chooses to live in a council house in London despite his pay and perks package as union general secretary totalling more than £140,000. The rent is estimated to be around £150 a week – a figure that would be much higher in the private sector. His spokesman recently said that Mr Crow makes “no apology” for living in social housing.
We’re going on a bearskin hunt Mine’s the black furry one
AFTER the taking of their official portrait last week, members of 1st Bn The Scots Guards begin the challenging task of picking out their personal bearskins, strewn across Horse Guards Parade in London. There was no such trouble for their Colonel, the Duke of Kent. He held on to his. The portrait was taken before the Guards’ role in Trooping the Colour, which takes place on Saturday.
By Nick Britten and Gordon Rayner THE Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are to make Kensington Palace, the former home of Diana, Princess of Wales, their official London residence.
The couple are expected to move into the palace, which was the Duke’s childhood home, as early as this week, before their first official royal engagement, a tour of Canada and California this month.
They have chosen rooms that have been unoccupied for some time and needed refurbishing and redecorating, including sorting out problems with asbestos.
In the run-up to their wedding in April, the Duke and Duchess, who live in Anglesey, where the Duke is serving with the RAF, shared living quarters with Prince Harry at Clarence House, the official London residence of the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall.
However, they were keen to have their own space and will have their London base at a “small apartment” at the palace, which is also home to other members of the Royal family. While the property has a clear emotional attachment,
the move there will be temporary, a spokesman for St James’s Palace said, with the Duke and Duchess understood to want a larger home in the capital for the long term. They intend to move out in about a year.
It is understood that the Duke did not specifically ask to move to Kensington Palace because of his and his mother’s ties there, but it was the only royal residence that had space available. When they want a longerterm property, they will look at what space is available at all the other royal palaces. The spokesman said: “A number of options for longerterm solutions are still being considered.
“The couple’s main home will continue to be their house on Anglesey, and their household office will continue to be based at St James’s Palace. The property in question at Kensington Palace into which the couple are temporarily moving is small.
“While it more than suffices for occasional visits to London for now, and the royal couple are very grateful for it, the Duke and Duchess are considering options for a more permanent official London residence. No suitable properties are currently available.”
By Mark Hughes RYAN GIGGS’S privacy injunction was under renewed scrutiny this week after allegations emerged that the Manchester United player conducted an extra-marital affair with his sister-in-law.
Legal experts said that Giggs was “making a mockery” of the system by refusing to withdraw a gagging order despite the renewed allegations about his private life.
At the weekend, a Sunday newspaper claimed that Giggs, a married father of two, conducted an eight-year affair with his brother’s wife, weeks after he was named as the footballer who obtained an injunction to suppress details of his affair with Imogen Thomas, a former Big Brother contestant.
The new claims led to questions about why Giggs’s privacy injunction, which covered only the allegations of his affair with Miss Thomas, remains in place.
His identity came out only after John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP, named him in Parliament, and his words could be reported under the rules of Parliamentary privilege.
The courts have refused appeals to lift the injunction, despite the footballer’s identity circulating on the internet.
Lawyers said this week that the emergence of further allegations showed that Giggs, 37, had treated the system with disdain.
Niri Shan, the head of media law at Taylor Wessing, said: “If the courts had their way we would still not be able to talk about Ryan Giggs’s affair with Imogen Thomas even though allegations are now in the public domain that he had a second affair with a different woman.
“You would have a situation where the courts would be preventing details of one affair being published, despite it being well documented that he allegedly had another affair. Even if the law may dictate otherwise, from a common-sense perspective it does not make sense.”
Mark Stephens, a media lawyer, said the new allegations meant that Giggs’s original injunction should be lifted. “This type of brazen behaviour should not attract the protection of the courts any longer,” he said.
Giggs is alleged to have had an eight-year affair with his sister-in-law, Natasha Giggs, which ended only in April.
Mrs Giggs, 28, is married to the former Welsh international’s younger brother, Rhodri.